{"id":640,"date":"2013-02-06T16:03:41","date_gmt":"2013-02-06T16:03:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/"},"modified":"2013-02-06T16:03:41","modified_gmt":"2013-02-06T16:03:41","slug":"georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/","title":{"rendered":"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the last few years, the Georgia Court of Appeals has issued several decisions clarifying Georgia law with respect to the enforceability of forum selection provisions in the restrictive covenant context.\u00a0 The Georgia Court of Appeals\u2019 recent decision in Carson v. Obor Holding Co.<\/span>, \u2014 Ga. App. \u2013, 734 S.E.2d 477 (Nov. 20, 2012) further establishes that if proceedings in a selected forum will likely produce a result offending an established Georgia public policy, a forum-selection clause selecting such a forum should be disregarded by Georgia courts.\u00a0 The Court in Carson<\/span> followed the line of cases, including Bunker Hill Intl. v. Nationsbuilder Ins. Svcs.<\/span>, 309 Ga. App. 503, 710 S.E.2d 662 (2011), that hold that such a Georgia public policy presents a \u201ccompelling reason\u201d to invalidate such clauses, as required by the Georgia Court of Appeals\u2019 holding in Iero v. Mohawk Finishing Products<\/span>, 243 Ga. App. 670, 671, 534 S.E.2d 136 (2000).<\/p>\n

These holdings, driven home by the opinion in Carson<\/span>, appear to confirm a shift in Georgia courts\u2019 approach to contractual forum-selection clauses.\u00a0 Historically, Georgia courts appeared reluctant to strike choice of forum or exclusive jurisdiction provisions, notwithstanding their potential implications on Georgia\u2019s public policy.\u00a0<\/sup>See<\/span>, <\/em>e.g.<\/span>, SR Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Bryant<\/span>, 267 Ga. App. 591, 592-93, 600 S.E.2d 610, 612-13\u00a0 (2004) (enforcing forum selection clause in agreement containing restrictive covenants); Iero v. Mohawk Finishing Prods., Inc.<\/span>, 243 Ga. App. 670, 534 S.E.2d 136 (2000) (enforcing contractual provision selecting New York as exclusive forum); see<\/span> also<\/span> Hasty v. St. Jude Med. S.C., Inc.<\/span>, No. 7:06-cv-102(HL), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34625 (M.D. Ga. May 11, 2007) (upholding Minnesota choice of forum provision where there is no proof that the application of Minnesota law will result in a less favorable outcome than the application of Georgia law); Rode v. St. Jude Med., S.C., Inc.<\/span>, No. 1:06-cv-02448-WSD, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91911 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2006) (mere speculation that a foreign court might apply law contrary to Georgia public policy insufficient to void forum selection provision).\u00a0 However, the approach adopted in Carson<\/span> gives Georgia courts more flexibility to evaluate each forum-selection clause in the context of the specific facts of a presented case.<\/p>\n

The analysis undertaken by the Georgia Court of Appeals in Carson<\/span> is in line with the analysis it applied in several recent decisions.\u00a0 For instance, in 2011, the Georgia Court of Appeals found that an Illinois forum selection provision was void where the plaintiff demonstrated that the non-competition covenant violated Georgia policy because an Illinois court would likely enforce the covenant at issue.\u00a0 Bunker Hill Int\u2019l, Ltd. v. Nationsbuilder Ins. Servs., Inc.<\/span>, 309 Ga. App. 503, 710 S.E.2d 662 (2011).\u00a0 However, in March of 2012, the Georgia Court of Appeals enforced a forum selection clause designating Maryland as the forum because while the restrictive covenants would violate Georgia public policy, the parties had not demonstrated that a Maryland court would enforce the covenants.\u00a0 Crump Ins. Servs. v. All Risks, Ltd.<\/span>, 315 Ga. App. 490, 727 S.E.2d 131 (2012).\u00a0 Then in Carson<\/span>, in November of 2012, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a trial court which had enforced a forum selection clause against two former employees challenging restrictive covenants in their employment contracts designating Florida as the parties\u2019 chosen forum.\u00a0 Carson v. Obor Holding Co.<\/span>, \u2014 Ga. App. \u2013, 734 S.E.2d 477 (2012).\u00a0 In Carson<\/span> the Court of Appeals found again that proceedings in Florida were likely to produce a result that offends settled public policy of Georgia.\u00a0 <\/em>Id.<\/span> at 484-85.<\/p>\n

Taken together, these recent cases, while indicating that forum selection provisions are still prima facie valid under Georgia law and presumptively enforceable, confirm that if a party demonstrates that a restrictive covenant violates Georgia public policy and that a court in the parties\u2019 selected forum likely would enforce the covenant, then Georgia courts have a compelling reason to invalidate the forum selection clause.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the last few years, the Georgia Court of Appeals has issued several decisions clarifying Georgia law with respect to the enforceability of forum selection provisions in the restrictive covenant context.\u00a0 The Georgia Court of Appeals\u2019 recent decision in Carson v. Obor Holding Co., \u2014 Ga. App. \u2013, 734 S.E.2d 477 (Nov. 20, 2012) further […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_mo_disable_npp":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9],"tags":[22],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nGeorgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions - Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions - Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the last few years, the Georgia Court of Appeals has issued several decisions clarifying Georgia law with respect to the enforceability of forum selection provisions in the restrictive covenant context.\u00a0 The Georgia Court of Appeals\u2019 recent decision in Carson v. Obor Holding Co., \u2014 Ga. App. \u2013, 734 S.E.2d 477 (Nov. 20, 2012) further […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-02-06T16:03:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin-bfv\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin-bfv\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/\",\"name\":\"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions - Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-06T16:03:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-02-06T16:03:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9083f2b0128a3cb69e9914047bb696ca\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/\",\"name\":\"Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.\",\"description\":\"A Business Law Firm In Atlanta\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9083f2b0128a3cb69e9914047bb696ca\",\"name\":\"admin-bfv\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin-bfv\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/author\/admin-bfv\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions - Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions - Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.","og_description":"In the last few years, the Georgia Court of Appeals has issued several decisions clarifying Georgia law with respect to the enforceability of forum selection provisions in the restrictive covenant context.\u00a0 The Georgia Court of Appeals\u2019 recent decision in Carson v. Obor Holding Co., \u2014 Ga. App. \u2013, 734 S.E.2d 477 (Nov. 20, 2012) further […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/","og_site_name":"Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.","article_published_time":"2013-02-06T16:03:41+00:00","author":"admin-bfv","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin-bfv","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/","name":"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions - Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-02-06T16:03:41+00:00","dateModified":"2013-02-06T16:03:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9083f2b0128a3cb69e9914047bb696ca"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/georgia-court-of-appeals-issues-another-important-ruling-on-the-enforceability-of-forum-selection-provisions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Georgia Court of Appeals Issues Another Important Ruling on the Enforceability of Forum Selection Provisions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/","name":"Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.","description":"A Business Law Firm In Atlanta","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9083f2b0128a3cb69e9914047bb696ca","name":"admin-bfv","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin-bfv"},"url":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/author\/admin-bfv\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/640"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/640\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bfvlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}